Showing posts with label apple. Show all posts
Showing posts with label apple. Show all posts

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Eating your own beats getting eaten.

Android-vs-apple-645x250

I had a bit of a brain jolt this morning when I saw Apple CEO Tim Cook's comments on cannibalisation as part of the Q113 earnings call today. 

“I see cannibalisation as a huge opportunity for us,” Cook said. “Our core philosophy is to never fear cannibalisation. If we don’t do it, someone else will. We know that iPhone has cannibalised some of our iPod business. That doesn’t worry us."

Why waste resource protecting territory that your competitor has under full attack and customers don't want? Keep going and take new ground with more advanced products as the technology and user preference develops.

It's so damn obvious I can't believe the years I've sat in meetings nodding along to 'evils of cannibalisation' pep talks. 

My first job was in FMCG sales and I remember we had to sell a new Weight Watchers branded product into the supermarkets. It was a fantastic product. Dripping chocolaty goodness with sexy packaging and hardly any calories. The issue was, we already had a plain old 'Lite' product that was doing quite well and we weren't allowed to cannibalise it.  Our instruction was to create new shelf space and not take any facings off the existing diet product. 

When presented with the Weight Watchers sample, buyers would always point at the 'Lite' product on the shelf and say: "so we don't need that one?"

All the 'anti-cannibalisation' tactic did was create confusion and slow down the adoption of the new shiny product. In the meantime. competitors could refine their their own 'Lite' offers by copying ours and gain more market share by picking off our older, weaker incumbent. 

Eating your own might sound primitive but it does keep you at the top of the food chain. Something Apple is very good at. 

 

Posted via email from cjlambert's posterous

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Customers won't pay for content today that was 'free' yesterday

News companies need to make sure that the product consumers are paying for looks and acts different to the one they previously consumed for free.

If customers aren't confident that what is on the other side of the paywall is quality, you won't get a click let alone a credit card number. 

The content needs to be repackaged and presented in a way that    the change required for the customer and makes them feel (real or perceived) that what's behind the paywall is better. Let them have a look around. Give them the assurance that the quality is good and you have what they want. Then get them to enter their credit card details. Not for one year or even one month subscription, but just to sign up to your site and get an account.  

The issue is not that customers don't want to pay for content. 

The issue is that they don't want to pay for the 'free' content. 

Make it look and act nothing like the 'free' content and they'll pay for it. 

Look at Apple iTunes. Apple confront the point of pain early in the sign up process and make the expectation very clear with the customer that you must pay for content. Consumers can't register an Apple ID without entering a credit card number or iTunes voucher. No payment method, no Apple ID. However, you can get an ID without actually making any monetary payment- Apple just want the credit card upfront so they can transact from day one. 

Remember that the content products (music, videos and books) are not new and has been available previously, but in a different format.

It feels new. The payment part is out of the way and forgotten and who knows what a song is meant to cost? Apple has told us in a palatable way.  

The focus for media companies now needs to be getting payment information off their audiences with simple product offerings that look and feel nothing like their existing ones.  

Repackaging products and getting a payment system in lowers the paywall and speeds up audience acquisition time. 

Strip back news offerings to the bare bones and move customers on to trackable customer ID's attached to a form of payment method. Sell them products and services they want and they will willingly provide a credit card number- even if it's not for news in the first instance. Initial payments may be small, even following the Paypal method of a five cent 'verification charge', but getting the payment system running then allows sites to transact products and services to the news audience.

Posted via email from cjlambert's posterous

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Samsung and Android continue US mobile dominance

With Apple's prowess in marketing it's easy forget what a critical role the carrier plays in manufacturer and platform market dominance. 

Google touts 'choice' as its big advantage over Apple with more carriers, manufacturers and handsets. 

Recent survey data from comScore shows that Samsung is still the leading OEM brand in the US market with 25.6% of US mobile subscribers, followed by LG and then Apple. 

Google Android is the number one smartphone platform with over the half the market share (Apple has just over one third). 

 

Top Mobile OEMs
3 Month Avg. Ending Jul. 2012 vs. 3 Month Avg. Ending Apr. 2012
Total U.S. Mobile Subscribers (Smartphone & Non-Smartphone) Ages 13+
Source: comScore MobiLens
  Share (%) of Mobile Subscribers
Apr-12 Jul-12 Point Change
Total Mobile Subscribers 100.0% 100.0% N/A
Samsung 25.9% 25.6% -0.3
LG 19.2% 18.4% -0.8
Apple 14.4% 16.3% 1.9
Motorola 12.5% 11.2% -1.3
HTC 6.0% 6.4% 0.4

Smartphone Platform Market Share

More than 114 million people in the U.S. owned smartphones during the three months ending in July, up 7 percent versus April. Google Android ranked as the top smartphone platform with 52.2 percent market share (up 1.4 percentage points), while Apple’s share increased 2 percentage points to 33.4 percent. RIM ranked third with 9.5 percent share, followed by Microsoft (3.6 percent) and Symbian (0.8 percent).

Top Smartphone Platforms
3 Month Avg. Ending Jul. 2012 vs. 3 Month Avg. Ending Apr. 2012
Total U.S. Smartphone Subscribers Ages 13+
Source: comScore MobiLens
  Share (%) of Smartphone Subscribers
Apr-12 Jul-12 Point Change
Total Smartphone Subscribers 100.0% 100.0% N/A
Google 50.8% 52.2% 1.4
Apple 31.4% 33.4% 2.0
RIM 11.6% 9.5% -2.1
Microsoft 4.0% 3.6% -0.4
Symbian 1.3% 0.8% -0.5

 

Posted via email from cjlambert's posterous